Request for comments definitionRequests

  • Request for Comments (RFC) Are you missing out when it comes to Machine Learning? If you're in the IT industry and looking to understand some of the context around Machine Learning and how it can be useful, here are some basics and essential concepts that help to define ML and its role in business.
  • 1 day ago The EPA on Friday introduced two proposals for public comment directed at E15 pump labels and requests to grant refiners general waivers from Renewable Fuel Standard obligations for 2019 and 2020.
  • Requests for Comments. This repository is the main location for work on and release of finalised Time Machine Request for Comments. Drafts in preparation.
Requests for comments rfc

Comments Requests Comments

Comments RequestsComments Requests

What is RFC (Request for Comments)? RFC (stands for Request For Comments) is a document that describes the standards, protocols, and technologies of the Internet and TCP/IP. Since 1969, about 2400 Requests for Comments (RFCs) have been published on various networking protocols, procedures, applications, and concepts. RFC – Request For Comments.

The Federal Trade Commission is currently accepting public comments on an application by prosthetics manufacturer Otto Bock HealthCare North America, Inc. (Ottobock) to divest to Proteor, Inc. certain assets it acquired when it consummated its acquisition of FIH Group Holdings, LLC (Freedom Innovations), including all microprocessor prosthetic knee products and technology.

The FTC staff's December 2017 complaint alleged that the consummated acquisition harmed competition in the U.S. market for microprocessor prosthetic knees (MPKs) by eliminating head-to-head competition between the two companies, removing a significant and disruptive competitor, and entrenching Ottobock’s position as the dominant supplier. In November 2019, upholding an administrative law judge’s decision, the Commission unanimously found that the merger was anticompetitive, and it ordered the assets unwound. Since December 2017, Ottobock has held the Freedom Innovations business separate from the Ottobock business under a hold-separate agreement with the FTC, overseen by a hold-separate monitor and manager, in order to facilitate any future divestiture of Freedom Innovations.

Although the Final Order issued by the Commission on Nov. 1, 2019, is still under review, Ottobock has moved forward with the required divestiture while its petition for review is stayed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. According to the divestiture application, Proteor, a French company with U.S. headquarters in Tempe, Arizona, is a well-established and reputable, worldwide manufacturer and supplier of lower-limb prosthetic devices. The proposed divestiture would accomplish the Final Order’s purposes by ensuring the continued operation of Freedom Innovations’ MPK business within Proteor and by remedying the lessening of competition that was alleged in the complaint, according to the divestiture application.

The divestiture application, along with instructions for filing comments, is available in the Federal Register. After a 30-day public comment period, the Commission will vote on whether to approve the application.

Comments Requests Yahoo

The Federal Trade Commission works to promote competition, and protect and educate consumers. You can learn more about how competition benefits consumers or file an antitrust complaint. Like the FTC on Facebook, follow us on Twitter, read our blogs, and subscribe to press releases for the latest FTC news and resources.